Is @hoyongjin/gitbook-mcp safe?
Model Context Protocol server for GitBook — read content and drive a change-request write workflow over stdio or streamable HTTP.
If an AI agent using this server were tricked, the damage it could do through this server is limited.
Why: no high-reach capabilities found.
What it can do
No commands, file changes, browser control or database access found in its code.
Tools it offers your AI (11):
- gitbook_whoami
- gitbook_list_orgs
- gitbook_list_spaces
- gitbook_get_space
- gitbook_list_pages
- gitbook_get_page
- gitbook_search
- gitbook_create_change_request
- gitbook_import_content
- gitbook_comment_change_request
- gitbook_merge_change_request
Code patterns worth reviewing
Automated pattern matches in the published package. Some are expected for this kind of server, and some may be false positives — they are pointers for review, not confirmed vulnerabilities.
External content fed into the prompt without isolation
The agent pulls in outside content (web pages, emails, retrieved documents) and adds it to its prompt, with no visible marking of that content as untrusted data.
dist/metrics.js:3
Install it pinned
{
"mcpServers": {
"gitbook": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@hoyongjin/gitbook-mcp@2.0.0"]
}
}
}Check your whole MCP setup
Agent Verify checks the servers in your Claude, Cursor and VS Code config — including whole-drive access and keys stored in plain text.
Maintain @hoyongjin/gitbook-mcp?
Show users you've thought about access: add the badge below. If something here is wrong or you've released a fix, ask for a re-scan — we update pages on request.
[](https://aimodularity.com/agentverify/mcp/hoyongjin-gitbook-mcp/)
Agent Verify reads the package published on npm as text — it is never installed or run. Ratings describe capability, not intent, and are an automated, evidence-based check, not a guarantee. Scanner 2.0.0.